Jennifer Sperber v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: JENNIFER SPERBER
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv09780
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE) (Dkt. #14 ) JS-6 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the parties Notice of Settlement, the Court orders that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 45 days from the date of this Order; provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 45-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41, which does not require the approval of the Court. Such a stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 45-day period, or by such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
February 26, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement of Entire Case filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hughes, Samantha)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES (DKT. #11 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' 1/25/2021 Joint Report and sets the following deadlines: Deadline to file joint report regarding agreed upon private neutral: 2/26/21. Last day to amend or add parties: 3/1/2021. Last day to participate in a settlement conference/mediation: 12/10/2021. Last day to file notice of settlement/joint report re settlement: 12/15/2021. Post Mediation Status Conference: 12/20/2021 at 11:30 AM. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 10/22/2021. Initial Expert Disclosures: 11/5/2021. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 11/19/2021. Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 12/10/2021. Last day to file All Motions (including discovery motions): 12/10/2021. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (jp)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than December 10, 2021. Post Mediation Status Conference set for December 20, 2021 11:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (tj)
January 25, 2021 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C-1)(Hughes, Samantha)
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by January 22, 2021. (droj)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court&s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:20-cv-09780 JAK(JEMx). (rn)
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears Attorney Erica Isabel De La Sierra CM/ECF login was used to e-file the Notice of Removal in this case for Attorney Samantha Joy Hughes, the Attorney who actually represents the defendant. Ms. De La Sierra did not sign the Notice of Removal, nor is mentioned anywhere in any document filed in this case. This substitute e-filing practice violates Local Rule 5-4.3.4(e). (lh)
October 27, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 27, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh)
October 26, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, identifying Ford Motor Company. (De La Sierra, Erica)
October 23, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Sperber. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/21/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 23, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, served on October 23, 2020. (De La Sierra, Erica)
October 23, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (De La Sierra, Erica)
October 23, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV36096 Receipt No: ACACDC-28689113 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Erica Isabel De La Sierra added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(De La Sierra, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennifer Sperber v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Represented By: Erica Isabel De La Sierra
Represented By: Judd A Gilefsky
Represented By: Samantha Joy Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JENNIFER SPERBER
Represented By: Allen-Michel D Resnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?