Jose Estrada v. OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
| Jose Estrada |
| O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC |
| 2:2020cv09790 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety #13 , this action is placed in inactive status. By 1/25/2020, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of 1/26/2020. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The Order to Show Cause dated 10/30/2020 #10 is discharged. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate All Currently Set Dates filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada, upon Defendant OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC served on 11/4/2020, answer due 11/25/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum intake specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jose Estradato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration of Dennis Price)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by November 9, 2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and the dismissal of any such claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). (iv)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28697958 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
