Tommy Lee Wiley, III v. M. Rosales et al
Tommy Lee Wiley, III |
M. Rosales and F. Villalobos |
2:2020cv09815 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING COURT CLERK TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CV 20-9815 AND TO REFILE PLEADING AT DKT. NO. 1 IN THAT CASE AS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN CV 19-1837 by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. It is clear that Wiley II was opened in error. Accordingly, the Court Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close Wiley II, CV 20-9815 MWF (PVC), and to refile the pleading at Docket No. 1 in that case as the Second Amended Complaint in Wiley I, CV 19-1837 MWF (PVC). (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants M. Rosales, F. Villalobos pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, filed by Plaintiff Tommy Lee Wiley, III. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.