Mark Lichtman et al v. Frank Miller et al
Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group and Mark Lichtman |
Frank Miller, Silenn Thomas and Frank Miller, Inc. |
2:2020cv09823 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R Wilner |
Stephen V Wilson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. upon Silenn Thomas waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Allen Grodsky. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. upon Frank Miller, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Allen Grodsky. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. upon Frank Miller waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Allen Grodsky. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Alekzandir Morton counsel for Plaintiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. Filed by Plaintiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Morton, Alekzandir) |
![]() |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants Frank Miller, Inc., Frank Miller, Silenn Thomas. (mrgo) |
![]() |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plainiffs Mark Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 , Summons Request #3 , Summons Request #5 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group, identifying Jo Lichtman. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plainiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Keller, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28713097 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Mark A Lichtman, The Lichtman Group. (Attorney Kenneth E Keller added to party Mark A Lichtman(pty:pla), Attorney Kenneth E Keller added to party The Lichtman Group(pty:pla))(Keller, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.