Calvin Leonard Sharp v. Stuart Sherman
| Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr |
| Warden Stuart Sherman |
| 2:2020cv09839 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| George H Wu |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge George H. Wu. (es)
|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. Pursuant to the Court's Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. #10 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. (es)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (ghap) |
| Filing 8 CONTENTIONS filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NATURE OF MOTION FOR ACQUITAL filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO ACCEPT HABEAS CORPUS filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO ACCEPT REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE EVID. CODE 451,452 AND RULE 3.1113 SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Writ of Error of Coram Nobis filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Summary Reversal filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. The Petitioner does not consent. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calvin Leonard Sharp v. Stuart Sherman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Stuart Sherman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Calvin Leonard Sharp, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
