Raul Rosales v. Worldwide Equipment Sales of California, LLC et al
| Raul Rosales |
| JEFFREY IRR, WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT SALES OF CALIFORNIA L.L.C. AN IOWA CORPORATION, Worldwide Equipment Sales of California LLC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv09932 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer DENYING Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. #10 ). See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REMAND AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ALEKSANDRA URBAN, ESQ IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REMAND)(Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Worldwide Equipment Sales of California LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit)(Antonyan, Armine) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales, (Lipeles, Kevin) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/25/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 15
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 1/18/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form, #11 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 by Clerk of Court. The Document is Accepted; however, the parties must file their Notice of Interested parties no later than December 11, 2020. (rfi) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must be comply with L.R.7-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by RAUL ROSALES Raul Rosales. Motion set for hearing on 1/4/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 NOTICE OF HEARING, #2 Declaration THOMAS H. SCHELLY, ESQ IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,270, #3 Declaration ALEKSANDRA URBAN, ESQ IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,270) (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF THOMAS H. SCHELLY, ESQ IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,270, #2 Declaration OF ALEKSANDRA URBAN, ESQ IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,270)(Lipeles, Kevin) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-09932 DSF(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Raul Rosales in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/26/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Jeffrey Irr, Worldwide Equipment Sales of California LLC in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/28/2020, attached as Exhibit C.(jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT SALES OF CALIFORNIA L.L.C. AN IOWA CORPORATION, identifying Wide World of Towing, LLC. (Antonyan, Armine) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT SALES OF CALIFORNIA L.L.C. AN IOWA CORPORATION identifying Wide World of Towing, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Antonyan, Armine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV32601 Receipt No: ACACDC-28753094 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant JEFFREY IRR, WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT SALES OF CALIFORNIA L.L.C. AN IOWA CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit) (Attorney Armine Antonyan added to party JEFFREY IRR(pty:dft), Attorney Armine Antonyan added to party WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT SALES OF CALIFORNIA L.L.C. AN IOWA CORPORATION (pty:dft))(Antonyan, Armine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
