Sukhdev Vasisht v. Hanmi Bank et al
Plaintiff: Sukhdev Vasisht
Defendant: Andrew Chong, Small Business Administration, Does 1-100, Hanmi Bank, Rajinder Adlakha, Reena Soni Adlakha and Does 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv09974
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Dolly M Gee
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2021 Filing 29 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20PSCV00396, acknowledged on 3/1/2021. (gk)
February 22, 2021 Filing 28 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. (gk)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court GRANTS the Defendant Small Business Administration's ("SBA") motion to dismiss #11 , without leave to amend. Because this case was removed to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1442(a)(1) and the SBA, the sole federal defendant, has been dismissed from the action, the Court remands this action to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 20PSCV00396. The pending motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Hanmi Bank and Andrew Chong #17 is DENIED as moot. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Defendant United States Small Business Administration's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Action #11 and Defendant Hanmi Bank's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #17 presently scheduled for hearing on December 18, 2020, are appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motions are taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 11, 2020 Filing 25 Notice of Unavailability filed by Defendants Rajinder Adlakha, Reena Soni Adlakha (Rupal, Mandeep)
December 4, 2020 Filing 24 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint #17 filed by Defendant Hanmi Bank. (Attachments: #1 Hanmi Objection to Pff's Dec in Support of Pff Opposition to Motion)(Jung, Robin)
November 30, 2020 Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht, re Declaration (Motion related), #22 , Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #20 , Declaration (Motion related), #21 served on November 30, 2020. (Flores, Aldo)
November 30, 2020 Filing 22 DECLARATION of Aldo A. Flores in Support of Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint #17 filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Flores, Aldo)
November 30, 2020 Filing 21 DECLARATION of Sukhdev Vasisht in Support of Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint #17 filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Flores, Aldo)
November 30, 2020 Filing 20 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Hanmi Bank re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint #17 filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (Flores, Aldo)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court sua sponte continues Defendant United States Small Business Administration's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Action #11 from December 4, 2020 to December 18, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 20, 2020 Filing 18 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint #17 filed by Defendants Andrew Chong, Hanmi Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Site Inspect Rpt, #2 Exhibit B-Lease, #3 Exhibit C-SBA Authorization, #4 Exhibit D-Occupancy Cert, #5 Exhibit E-Loan Agrmt)(Jung, Robin)
November 20, 2020 Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint filed by defendants Andrew Chong, Hanmi Bank. Motion set for hearing on 12/18/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robin Jung with Exh 1, #2 Proposed Order) (Jung, Robin)
November 20, 2020 Filing 16 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Small Business Administration #11 filed by Defendant Small Business Administration. (Green, Paul)
November 17, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-8 Memorandum/brief exceeding 10 pages shall contain table of contents. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
November 13, 2020 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht, re Declaration (Motion related) #13 , Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #12 served on 11/13/2020. (Flores, Aldo)
November 13, 2020 Filing 13 DECLARATION of Aldo Flores in Support of Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Small Business Administration #11 filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (Flores, Aldo)
November 13, 2020 Filing 12 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Small Business Administration #11 filed by Plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (Flores, Aldo)
November 5, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Small Business Administration filed by Defendant Small Business Administration. Motion set for hearing on 12/4/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul B. Green, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order) (Green, Paul)
November 5, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Andrew Chong, Hanmi Bank, (Jung, Robin)
November 5, 2020 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Amended Complaint, filed by defendants Hanmi Bank, Andrew Chong.(Attorney Robin H Jung added to party Andrew Chong(pty:dft), Attorney Robin H Jung added to party Hanmi Bank(pty:dft))(Jung, Robin)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant General Order 19-03 (identical case) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Case number now reads as 2:20-cv-09974 DMG(MAAx). (rn)
November 3, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap)
November 2, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Small Business Administration, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 served on 11/02/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice to State Court of Removal, #2 Proof of Service)(Green, Paul)
October 29, 2020 NON CONFORM COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Rajinder Adlakha, Reena Soni Adlakha, Andrew Chong, Does 1-100, inclusive, Hanmi Bank, Small Business Administration amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Sukhdev Vasisht. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1)(ghap)
October 29, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Small Business Administration. Related Case(s): CV 20-07574-DMG-MAAx (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Green, Paul)
October 29, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Small Business Administration. (Green, Paul)
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20PSCV00396 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by defendant Small Business Administration. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State court docket, #3 Exhibit 3 -Order Granting dismissal of Small Business Administration, #4 Proof of Service) (Attorney Paul Bartholomew Green added to party Small Business Administration(pty:dft))(Green, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sukhdev Vasisht v. Hanmi Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Chong
Represented By: Robin H Jung
Represented By: Brian H Newman
Represented By: Brian H. Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Small Business Administration
Represented By: Paul Bartholomew Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hanmi Bank
Represented By: Robin H Jung
Represented By: Brian H Newman
Represented By: Brian H. Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rajinder Adlakha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reena Soni Adlakha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sukhdev Vasisht
Represented By: Aldo Arturo Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?