Jacqueline D. Perez v. Andrew Saul
| JACQUELINE D. PEREZ |
| Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv10006 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-10006 KK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Amanda Schapel added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Schapel, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jacqueline D. Perez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 11/16/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. TORRES. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to CLERK. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Jacqueline D. Perez. (LaTour, Bill) |
|
|
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Andrew Saul. (dts) |
|
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Jaqueline D. Perez. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF JACQUELINE D. PEREZ. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF JACQUELINE D. PEREZ, (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF JACQUELINE D. PEREZ. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JACQUELINE D. PEREZ. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF JACQUELINE D. PEREZ. (Attorney Bill LaTour added to party JACQUELINE D. PEREZ(pty:pla))(LaTour, Bill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.