Ty Kirkpatrick v. Timothy Hubman et al
Petitioner: Ty Kirkpatrick
Respondent: Coexist Foundation and Timothy Hubman
Case Number: 2:2020cv10161
Filed: October 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion #14 is denied without prejudice to filing a motion for service by publication after plaintiff has provided sufficient admissible evidence to establish his exhaustive attempts to locate and serve defendants. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service demonstrating service of the summons and complaint on defendants or a renewed motion no later than 12/31/2020. No further extensions will be granted or considered. (vdr)
November 12, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION for Service by Publication filed by Plaintiff Ty Kirkpatrick. (iv)
November 5, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
November 5, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh)
November 5, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 3:20-cv-01063-GPC-DEB, from U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego). The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:20-cv-10161-FMO (SKx). (lh)
November 5, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Any matters previously referred are transferred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. New Case Number 2:20-cv-10161-FMO (SKx). (lh)
November 3, 2020 Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 30, 2020 Filing 8 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 Case transferred to District of Central District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California*.. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/27/20. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 Plaintiff's Ex Parte MOTION for Transfer of Venue by Ty Kirkpatrick. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing of Motion)(dlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2020: #2 Declaration) (NEF regenerated to include affidavit) (dlg). [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Ty Kirkpatrick. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why this Case Should not Be Dismissed or Transferred for Lack of Proper Venue. Plaintiff shall file a response on or before October 23, 2020. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/6/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
September 30, 2020 Filing 3 Plaintiff's Ex Parte MOTION for Service by Publication by Ty Kirkpatrick. (dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
June 11, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) (dsn) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]
June 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coexist Foundation, Timothy Hubman ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS122001.), filed by Ty Kirkpatrick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1063-GPC-DEB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Kirkpatrick, Ty)(vxc) (dsn) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/30/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ty Kirkpatrick v. Timothy Hubman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Coexist Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Timothy Hubman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ty Kirkpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?