Ronnie Baker et al v. County of Santa Barbara et al
Egan Miller-Baker, Ronnie Baker and Jamee Baker |
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and County of Santa Barbara |
2:2020cv10167 |
November 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eric S. Rossman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jamee Baker, Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29611633) filed by Plaintiffs Jamee Baker, Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker. (Attachments: #1 Idaho State Bar Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Santa Barbara answer now due 1/14/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Ronnie Baker; Egan Miller-Baker; Jamee Baker.(Kristensen, John) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker, Jamee Baker, upon Defendant County of Santa Barbara served on 11/24/2020, answer due 12/15/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Angelica Ramirez, Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kristensen, John) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Eric Rossman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants County of Santa Barbara. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Jamee Baker, Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Jamee Baker, Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker, (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Jamee Baker, Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28867682 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Ronnie Baker, Egan Miller-Baker, Jamee Baker. (Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Jamee Baker(pty:pla), Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Ronnie Baker(pty:pla), Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Egan Miller-Baker(pty:pla))(Kristensen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.