William Sardi et al v. Dorothy Carfrae et al
| M. S. and William Sardi |
| Doreen Boxer, Shannon Payne and Dorothy Carfrae |
| 2:2020cv10186 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Amended Complaint #10 . (dts) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2020: #1 Notice of Dismissal) (dts).
|
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Doreen Boxer, Dorothy Carfrae, Shannon Payne amending Complaint #1 , filed by Plaintiff William Sardi(hr) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (dts)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400.00 William Sardi 11/20/2020. Re: Order,, #4 . Receipt number LA214687. (Anaya, Gabriella) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff William Sardi, re CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT-DEMAND FOR EX PARTE JUDGEMENT ISSUED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE WITH DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE PRELIMINARY RELIEF AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF REGARDING VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION #1 served on 11/4/20, PARTY SERVED: Shannon Payne, an individual, BY LEAVING WITH: Chiara McDonald-Receptionist, Authorized To Accept For Attorney. (hr) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff William Sardi, re CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT-DEMAND FOR EX PARTE JUDGEMENT ISSUED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE WITH DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE PRELIMINARY RELIEF AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF REGARDING VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION #1 served on 11/4/20, PARTY SERVED: Dorothy Carfrae, an individual, BY LEAVING WITH: Joselyn Cuen-Receptionist, Authorized To Accept. (hr) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff William Sardi, re CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT-DEMAND FOR EX PARTE JUDGEMENT ISSUED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE WITH DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE PRELIMINARY RELIEF AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF REGARDING VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION #1 served on 11/4/20, PARTY SERVED: Doreen Boxer, an individual, BY LEAVING WITH: J.R Cruz-Judicial Assistant, Authorized To Accept. (hr) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Failure to File Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Complaint - (Referred) #1 , NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #2 Accordingly, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order he must (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee; (2) file a request for in forma pauperis status; or (3) show cause in writing why he is unable to do so. (dts) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/6/2020: #1 IFP APPLICATION) (dts).
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Doreen Boxer, Dorothy Carfrae, Shannon Payne Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, filed by Plaintiffs William Sardi, M. S. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
