Brian Lugrain v. EKO North America, Inc., et al
| Brian Lugrain |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation, EKO USA LLC, Does 1-25, inclusive, EKO Development Ltd and EKO North America, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv10249 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVALOF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWALOF ATTORNEY by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Katherine Vilchez is substituted as counsel of record in place and stead of of Heather M. Bean, Esq and Steven D. Whang, Esq. (yl)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Katherine Vilchez in place of attorney Heather M. Bean filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bean, Heather) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (droj)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Katherine Pollard Vilchez on behalf of Defendants EKO Development Ltd, EKO North America, Inc., EKO USA LLC (Vilchez, Katherine) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants EKO Development Ltd, EKO North America, Inc., EKO USA LLC.(Attorney Katherine Pollard Vilchez added to party EKO Development Ltd(pty:dft), Attorney Katherine Pollard Vilchez added to party EKO North America, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Katherine Pollard Vilchez added to party EKO USA LLC(pty:dft))(Vilchez, Katherine) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:20-cv-10249 VAP (SKx). (esa)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does, EKO Development Ltd, EKO North America, Inc., EKO USA LLC, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Brian Lugrain. (filed in state court 8/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (Bean, Heather) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Bean, Heather) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Bean, Heather) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Bean, Heather) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, identifying Brian Lugrain. (Bean, Heather) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from LOS ANGELES COUNTY, case number 20STCV31856 Receipt No: ACACDC-28916875 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Statement of Damages, #3 Exhibit Costco CA SOS, #4 Exhibit EKO FL SOS, #5 Exhibit EKO NV SOS) (Attorney Heather M Bean added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:dft))(Bean, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
