Better Mouse Company, LLC v. VTIN Technology Co., Limited
| Better Mouse Company, LLC |
| VTIN Technology Company, Limited and VTIN Technology Co., Limited |
| 2:2020cv10269 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge R. Gary Klausner: GRANTING #18 Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC, designating Steven W. Ritcheson as local counsel. (Thrasher, Lupe)
|
| Filing 18 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/30/2020, Receipt No. 29264532) filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC) #14 The document is stricken. Counsel to file a new application if appearance still desired. (jre) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/30/2020, Receipt No. 29264532) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document submitted in wrong case. Other error(s) with document(s): This is for case 8:20-CV-2166 DOC. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Withdrawal of Notice of Deficiency in Electronically filed Pro Hac Vice Application (G-112C) - optional html form, #12 , Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64), #13 filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 14 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/30/2020, Receipt No. 29264532) filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 13 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/30/2020, Receipt No. 29264504) filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29264504) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29264504) filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Ritcheson, Steven) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Hao Ni. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant VTIN Technology Co., Limited. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC identifying NONE as Corporate Parent. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28926975 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Better Mouse Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Attorney Steven W. Ritcheson added to party Better Mouse Company, LLC(pty:pla))(Ritcheson, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
