Ecoark Holdings, Inc. v. MW Capital Fund, LLC et al
| ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc. |
| DOES 1 to 50, BRUCE FOLLESE, MW CAPITAL FUND, LLC and DOES 1 to 50 inclusive |
| 2:2020cv10308 |
| November 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles Claudio Simpkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and designating Francis G. Rushford as local counsel #14 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles Claudio Simpkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 12/29/2020, Receipt No. 29760323) filed by Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order G-64 Proposed Order) (Rushford, Francis) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court STRIKES the Application filed at ECF No. #10 . Simpkins may file a corrected application without resubmitting the filing fee. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Bruce Follese, MW Capital Fund, LLC. (lc) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request, #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer erroneously submitted same summons with 2 defendants listed to be served- twice ( as attached). Clerk will issue ONLY One summons with the 2 defendants as listed. Therefore No Response to this notice is required. (lc) |
| Filing 10 *[STRICKEN AS OF 12-30-20 #13 * First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney CHARLES C. SIMPKINS to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29760323) filed by ECOARKHoldings INC Ecoark Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order PRO HAC VICE) (Rushford, Francis) Modified on 12/30/2020 (yl). |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #7 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Rushford, Francis) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by EcoArk Holdings Inc. Ecoark Holdings, Inc., (Rushford, Francis) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ecoark Holdings, Inc.. (Rushford, Francis) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Claudio Simpkins. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28958550 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Francis Gerard Rushford, I added to party ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC(pty:pla))(Rushford, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
