Brian Whitaker v. Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. et al
Brian Whitaker |
DOES 1-10 and Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. |
2:2020cv10314 |
November 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing of First Amended Complaint in Lieu of Opposing Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker(Handy, Russell) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.. Motion set for hearing on 3/12/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1 to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 2 to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Exhibit 3 to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit 4 to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit 5 to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) (Arnett, Ashley) |
![]() |
Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Minh N. Vu to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29210424) filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Arnett, Ashley) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. answer now due 12/18/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P..(Arnett, Ashley) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/25/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO THE DECLARATION OF ASHLEY N. ARNETT) (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P., identifying 1. Plaintiff Brian Whitaker 2. Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. Defendant has no parent company and no publicly held corporation owns more than 10 % of Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.s stock. 3. Universal Fortuna Investment Inc. 4. Hilton Domestic Operating Co.. (Arnett, Ashley) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Ashley N. Arnett re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Arnett, Ashley) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.. (Arnett, Ashley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 20TRCV00678 Receipt No: ACACDC-28963250 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.. (Attorney Ashley Nicole Arnett added to party Fortuna Enterprises, L.P.(pty:dft))(Arnett, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.