Pedro Navarro v. U.S. Foods, Inc. et al
| Pedro Navarro |
| DOES 1 through 50 Inclusive, U.S. Foods, Inc. doing business as U.S. Foodservice, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv10387 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| John E McDermott |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/12/2021. (tj)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/10/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, U.S. Foods, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Pedro Navarro. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/14/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc., re Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Declaration #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #5 , Declaration #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on November 12, 2020. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc., identifying 1. Pedro Navarro, Plaintiff; and 2. US Foods, Inc. (dba U.S. FoodService, Inc.), Defendant.. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Jonathan L. Brophy re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc.. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Rich Padilla re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc.. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc.. (Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV35078 Receipt No: ACACDC-28987704 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Sharde Thomas Skahan added to party U.S. Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Skahan, Sharde) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
