Luis Marquez v. Chung Lin Chang et al
Plaintiff: Luis Marquez
Defendant: Chung Lin Chang LLC and Chung Lin Chang
Case Number: 2:2020cv10447
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS MOVING CASE TO INACTIVE CALENDAR PENDING SETTLEMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Notice of Settlement #16 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mrgo)
January 14, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, ORDERING Letters to Judge Eick, Defendant's Application for Stay of Proceedings, Letters to Plaintiff Counsel, Two Photographs submitted by Plaintiff Luis Marquez received on 1/6/2021 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Documents must be filed electronically; No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies; Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address; No letters to the judge; No proof of service attached to document(s). (mrgo)
January 13, 2021 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, re Response #13 , Notice of Appearance #12 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gutierrez, Faythe)
January 12, 2021 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquezto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #11 (Gutierrez, Faythe)
January 12, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez on behalf of Plaintiff Luis Marquez (Attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Gutierrez, Faythe)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Show Cause Response due by 1/12/2021.) (mrgo)
December 17, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Chung Lin Chang served on 12/11/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chris Fonseca (front desk) and person in charge and authorized to accept on behalf. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
December 17, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Chung Lin Chang LLC served on 12/11/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chris Fonseca (front desk) and person in charge and authorized to accept on behalf in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
November 18, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Chung Lin Chang, Chung Lin Chang LLC. (esa)
November 18, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
November 18, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa)
November 16, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell)
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez, (Handy, Russell)
November 16, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell)
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29020354 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luis Marquez v. Chung Lin Chang et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chung Lin Chang LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chung Lin Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Marquez
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Chris Carson
Represented By: Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?