Henry W. Foote v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan
| Henry W. Foote |
| The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan |
| 2:2020cv10573 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 3/1/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan.(Attorney Peter Maretz added to party The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan(pty:dft))(Maretz, Peter) |
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Henry W. Foote. (Petti, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Henry W. Foote, (Petti, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Henry W. Foote. (Petti, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29108153 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Henry W. Foote. (Attorney Russell G Petti added to party Henry W. Foote(pty:pla))(Petti, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henry W. Foote v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan | |
| Represented By: | Peter Maretz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Henry W. Foote | |
| Represented By: | Russell G Petti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
