Shahrooz Sabzehroo v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Shahrooz Sabzehroo and individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. |
| Capital One Services, LLC, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
| 2:2020cv10615 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Gail J Standish |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Shahrooz Sabzehroo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.. (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shahrooz Sabzehroo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated., (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Shahrooz Sabzehroo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.. (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29129869 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Shahrooz Sabzehroo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.. (Attorney Amir J Goldstein added to party Shahrooz Sabzehroo(pty:pla), Attorney Amir J Goldstein added to party individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Amir) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
