Chika Lim v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company et al
| Chika Lim |
| Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv10666 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
0ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer of Dismissal With Prejudice #28 . See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Satisfaction of Judgment by Plaintiff Chika Lim filed by defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Satisfaction of Judgment)(Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 27 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $1,565.05 in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. RE: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against plaintiff Chika Lim re: Judgment #25 , #26 (kr) |
| Filing 26 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against plaintiff Chika Lim re: Judgment #25 , filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 25 JUDGMENT #8 #24 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. See judgment for specifics. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) |
|
Filing 24
Order GRANTING Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. #8 ) by Judge Dale S. Fischer. See order for specifics. (lom)
|
| Filing 23 OBJECTION IN OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 PLAINTIFF LIMS OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT ALLSTATE NORTHBROOKS SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim. (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
| Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF GENUINE DISPUTES AND ADDITIONAL UNCONTROVERTED MATERIAL FACTS filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim. (Attachments: #1 Supplement SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF TOM G. ANTUNOVICH IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF LIMS OPPOSITION TO ALLSTATES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, #2 Proof of Service)(Antunovich, Tomislav) |
| Filing 21 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 Supplemental Separate Statement per Court's Order [DKT 20] filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffrey V. Commisso, #2 Proof of Service)(Commisso, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer re Supplemental Evidence on Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's submission is to be filed no later than 2/8/2021. Plaintiff's responsive submission is to be filed no later than 2/22/2021. The matter will be under submission at that time. (jp)
|
|
Filing 19
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court, on its own motion, takes the Motion #8 set for Monday, January 25, 2021 off calendar and under submission. The Court will set a new hearing date if it decides oral argument would be helpful. A written order will follow. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 REQUEST for Leave of Jeffrey V. Commisso to Appear for Telephonically at its Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. Request set for hearing on 1/25/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Permission to Appear Telephonically) (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 OBJECTION IN OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 RE ALLSTATES USE OF AUTHORITIES AND ARGUMENTS RAISED FOR FIRST TIME IN REPLY BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim. (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
| Filing 16 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence in Opposition to Summary Judgment)(Commisso, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/2/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 14
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/27/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 10/26/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 Days, filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Antunovich, Tomislav) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #8 filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Separate Statement, #3 Proof of Service)(Antunovich, Tomislav) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Errata to Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. Hearing Date Corrected (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Errata to Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. Motion set for hearing on 1/28/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, #2 Defendant's Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, #3 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Summary Judgment, #4 Declaration of Ann Del Giudice in Support of Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, #5 Declaration of Jeffrey V. Commisso in Support of Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, #6 Proposed Order, #7 Proof of Service) (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 1/11/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. Filed in State Court on 11/20/2020 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Does 1 to 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Chika Lim. Filed in State Court on 10/26/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, identifying The Allstate Corporation and Chika Lim. (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Commisso, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV41010 Receipt No: ACACDC-29157295 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Superior Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Superior Court Answer, #3 Exhibit Service of Process, #4 Proof of Service to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Jeffrey Vincent Commisso added to party Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Commisso, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
