Jerry Bailey v. Warden C.V.S.P.
Petitioner: Jerry Bailey
Respondent: Warden C.V.S.P.
Case Number: 2:2020cv10685
Filed: November 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXHAUSTION by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner do one of the following: (1) show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies; (2) file a formal stay-and-abey motion if he believes he can make the required showings under Rhines; or (3) request that the Petition be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with the understanding that any later petition may be time barred under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1). (es)
November 25, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 Letter Re Habeas Corpus Transfer-In) (car)
November 25, 2020 Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern
May 19, 2020 Filing 3 Case transferred to Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 W 1st Street, Suite 4311**Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565*. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) [Transferred from California Southern on 11/25/2020.]
May 18, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jerry Bailey. (jms)(jrd) [Transferred from California Southern on 11/25/2020.] Modified on 11/25/2020 (car).
May 18, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Warden C.V.S.P., filed by Jerry Bailey. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-929-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms)(jrd) [Transferred from California Southern on 11/25/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jerry Bailey v. Warden C.V.S.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerry Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden C.V.S.P.
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?