Jeremy A. Davis v. Robert Werthwein et al
| Jeremy A. Davis |
| Robert Werthwein, Terry Scofidio, Terry Brown and Carl McGuire, III |
| 2:2020cv10895 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Sheri Pym |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and as Time-Barred. Petitioner to respond to the Order to Show Cause in writing by no later than January 19, 2021 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Jeremy A. Davis. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
