Johnathan Cruz v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Johnathan Cruz |
| United Financial Casualty Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Does 2-20 and DOE |
| 2:2020cv10966 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Steve Kim |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint #12 filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Karl A Bekeny APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant United Financial Casualty Company, designating Bart L Kessel as local counsel. (jp)
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Karl A. Bekeny to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant United Financial Casualty Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30186852) filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kessel, Bart) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint #12 filed by Plaintiff Johnathan Cruz. (Grombacher, Kiley) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint #12 filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company. Motion set for hearing on 2/8/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order) (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Johnathan Cruz pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Grombacher, Kiley) |
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company.. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to United Financial Casualty Company answer now due 1/8/2021; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company answer now due 1/8/2021, re Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant United Financial Casualty Company; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company.(Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Johnathan Cruz. Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 12/4/2020 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Johnathan Cruz. Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A pg. 20 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 12/4/2020 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT as to fictitious name of DOE 1. Upon the filing of the complaint, the plaintiff, being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be United Financial Casualty Company amending First Amended Complaint,, by Plaintiff Johnathan Cruz. Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A pg. 33 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 12/2/2020. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company. (Mikula, Chelsea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vetura, case number 56-2020-00542450-CU-CO-VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-29316745 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants United Financial Casualty Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A) (Attorney Chelsea Royce Mikula added to party Progressive Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Chelsea Royce Mikula added to party United Financial Casualty Company(pty:dft))(Mikula, Chelsea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
