G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Andreas E. Wright et al
| G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC |
| Andreas E. Wright individually and d/b/a BurgerIm, Eight & Nine Collective, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a BurgerIm, John Hollingsworth individually and d/b/a BurgerIm, John Hollingsworth individually doing business as BurgerIm, Eight and Nine Collective, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as BurgerIm, Andreas E. Wright individually doing business as BurgerIm, Oluwatosin C. Akinmade individually and d/b/a BurgerIM and Oak's Services, LLC f/k/a Oak's Foundation, LLC, an unknown business entity d/b/a BurgerIM |
| 2:2020cv11019 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| William D Keller |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. § 521 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER EXTENDING TIME, #28 by Judge William D. Keller: Having considered the parties joint stipulation, and for good cause shown, this Court hereby finds as follows: The Parties request is GRANTED. The time to file an answer is extended until October 1, 2021. SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 1, 2021 re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, #26 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Oluwatosin C. Akinmade, Oak's Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer)(Attorney Lisbeth Bosshart Merrill added to party Oluwatosin C. Akinmade(pty:dft), Attorney Lisbeth Bosshart Merrill added to party Oak's Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Merrill, Lisbeth) |
| Filing 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, #26 served on August 4, 2021. (Riley, Thomas) |
|
Filing 26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge William D. Keller: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writingno later than August 30, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Oluwatosin C. Akinmade, and Oaks Services, LLC. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following as an appropriate response to this OSC on or before the above date: 1) Answer to Complaint; or 2) Plaintiff's Application for Default (Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)), and Proof of Service of summons and complaint upon defendant(s). is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to serve this minute order on all defendants within 48 hours from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more details. (shb)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Eight and Nine Collective, Inc., John Hollingsworth, Andreas E. Wright. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 24 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint, #19 as to Defendant Oak's Services, LLC. (shb) |
| Filing 23 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #19 as to Defendant Oluwatosin C. Akinmade. (shb) |
| Filing 22 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Oluwatosin C. Akinmade, Oak's Services, LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC(Riley, Thomas) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge William D. Keller: The Court, upon review of the Plaintiff's request and representations presented in the above-entitled matter hereby orders the following: Plaintiff shall be granted sixty (60) days to file an amended complaint, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #15 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas P. Riley in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #15 served on 4/5/2021. (Riley, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge William D. Keller: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than Apri1 22, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to the defendants. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following as an appropriate response to this OSC on or before the above date: 1) Answer to Complaint; or 2) Plaintiff's Application for Default. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive document on or before the date upon which a response is due. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to serve this minute order. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, upon Defendant John Hollingsworth served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, upon Defendant Eight and Nine Collective, Inc. served on 2/17/2021, answer due 3/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, upon Defendant Andreas E. Wright served on 2/17/2021, answer due 3/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Eight and Nine Collective, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant John Hollingsworth. (lh) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andreas E. Wright. (lh) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Chair of the Case Management and Assignment Committee: Pursuant to General Order 19-03, all related G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC cases have been assigned to Judge William D. Keller for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that are or may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The Related Group Control Number is CV 10-128-WDK(JCx). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge William D. Keller and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Riley, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29341986 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Attorney Thomas P Riley added to party G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC(pty:pla))(Riley, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
