Gina Trang v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Gina Trang |
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, Bank of America, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv11042 |
December 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:20-cv-02305-JVS (KESx). (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, identifying BAC North America Holdings Company, NB Holdings Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. (Stastny, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,. (Stastny, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-0116948 Receipt No: ACACDC-29361500 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Attorney Douglas C Stastny added to party BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,(pty:dft))(Stastny, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.