Kyu Hwa Back v. Marla Gluck et al
KYU HWA BACK |
MARLA GLUCK doing business as LA PRESS, LEONARDO M. LOPEZ and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2020cv11102 |
December 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Josephine L Staton |
Michael R Wilner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by PLAINTIFF Kyu Hwa Back pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Marla Gluck. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (mku) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Marla Gluck, Leonardo M. Lopez. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 KYU HWA BACK. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff KYU HWA BACK. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29394071 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party KYU HWA BACK(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.