Eric C. Beauchamp v. Patricia Bradley
Petitioner: Eric C. Beauchamp
Respondent: Patricia Bradley
Case Number: 2:2020cv11295
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2021 Filing 15 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Respondent Patricia Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Declaration (Supplemental) of Eliezer Ben-Shmuel, #2 Exhibit A to Supplemental Ben-Shmuel Decl., #3 Exhibit B to Supplemental Ben-Shmuel Decl., #4 Exhibit C to Supplemental Ben-Shmuel Decl., #5 Exhibit D to Supplemental Ben-Shmuel Decl.)(Seiden, Kathrynne)
January 22, 2021 Filing 14 REPLY to MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Petitioner Eric C. Beauchamp. (efc)
January 14, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Respondent Patricia Bradley, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #10 served on 1/13/21. (Seiden, Kathrynne)
January 14, 2021 Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, ALL PARTIES having consented in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P. 73(b). Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for final disposition. Any appeal shall be taken before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. (rn)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re: Motion to Dismiss Case #9 . IT IS ORDERED that: 1. By no later than February 2, 2021, Petitioner shall file and serve any opposition to the Motion (Opposition); 2.Within 7 days of service of the Opposition, Respondent may file and serve a Reply; and 3.Once briefing is completed or the time for briefing passes, the Motion will stand under submission to the Court. (efc)
January 13, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Seiden, Kathrynne)
January 12, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Respondent Patricia Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Eliezer Ben-Shmuel, #2 Declaration of Jacob Petersen) (Seiden, Kathrynne)
December 29, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Eric C. Beauchamp. (rn)
December 22, 2020 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Respondent Patricia Bradley, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/12/2021 #5 served on 12/21/20. (Seiden, Kathrynne)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: granting #5 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Answer. Patricia Bradley's answer is due 1/12/2021. (efc)
December 18, 2020 Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/12/2021 filed by Respondent Patricia Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application and Modifying Briefing Schedule) (Seiden, Kathrynne)
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Kathrynne N. Seiden on behalf of Respondent Patricia Bradley. (Attorney Kathrynne Nicole Seiden added to party Patricia Bradley(pty:res))(Seiden, Kathrynne)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. that Respondent Patricia Bradley file Answer to the Petition not later than 1/5/2021. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Blank Consent Form) (efc)
December 15, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
December 9, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE PAID), filed by Petitioner Eric C. Beauchamp. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eric C. Beauchamp v. Patricia Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric C. Beauchamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Patricia Bradley
Represented By: Kathrynne Nicole Seiden
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?