Hector Clarence Anderson v. Keefe Commissary Network L.L.C. et al
Plaintiff: Hector Clarence Anderson
Defendant: Western Digitial Technologies, Inc. doing business as SanDisk and Keefe Commissary Network L.L.C. doing business as Access Securepak
Case Number: 2:2020cv11315
Filed: December 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2021 Filing 7 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400.00 from Remy Bailey 01/21/2021. Re: Notice Re: Discrepancies with Lodging of Complaint (CV-47P),,, #1 . Receipt number LA217178. (Anaya, Gabriella)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES. CASE DISMISSED IMMEDIATELY #3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
January 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
January 5, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car)
December 29, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson. (car)
December 14, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson. Upon submission of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action will be dismissed and the file closed. If you submit the CV-60P form or pay the filing fee within THIRTY DAYS, your case will be filed. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Lodged Complaint (Attachments: #1 CV-60P Form) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2020: #2 Lodged Complaint) (car).
December 11, 2020 LODGED COMPLAINT sought to be filed by Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hector Clarence Anderson v. Keefe Commissary Network L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hector Clarence Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Western Digitial Technologies, Inc. doing business as SanDisk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network L.L.C. doing business as Access Securepak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?