Gissel Castano Diaz v. County of Santa Barbara et al
| Gissel Castano Diaz |
| County of Santa Barbara, Anthony M. Kouremetis, Deputy Anthony M. Kouremetis and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv11335 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Santa Barbara, Anthony M. Kouremetis. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gissel Castano Diaz. (Smith, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gissel Castano Diaz. (Smith, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gissel Castano Diaz, (Smith, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29533954 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Gissel Castano Diaz. (Attorney Patrick S Smith added to party Gissel Castano Diaz(pty:pla))(Smith, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
