Betty Reed v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Betty Reed |
| Does 1-10, inclusive and Walmart Inc. |
| Walmart Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv11553 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE DUE TO SETTLEMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ordered that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for 60 days to vacate this Order and to reopen the action on a showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed and further proceedings are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement of Entire Case filed by plaintiff Betty Reed. (Haag, Laurel) |
|
Filing 13
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Court's rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that person's name (only if the person is an attorney) and the person's position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the "weeks before trial" column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this Courts rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. There is no reason that the parties cannot immediately proceed to a settlement conference. The parties may wish to check the availability of a VTC settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Louise LaMothe.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(Rodriguez, Robert) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/24/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Inclusive, Walmart Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Betty Reed. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/21/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Walmart Stores, Inc., re Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Declaration #5 Certificate of Service served on 12/22/2020. (Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFENDANT WALMART, INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Walmart Stores, Inc. (Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Robert C. Rodriguez re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Movant Walmart Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Stores, Inc., (Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Walmart Stores, Inc.. (Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Walmart Stores, Inc.. (Rodriguez, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV40400 Receipt No: ACACDC-29659497 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Walmart Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Robert Campbell Rodriguez added to party Walmart Stores, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Rodriguez, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
