Collin Hicks v. McLaren Automotive, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Collin Hicks
Defendant: MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Interested Party: McLaren Finance plc
Case Number: 2:2020cv11558
Filed: December 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2021 Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rachel Leigh Ellis counsel for Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc.. Adding RACHEL L. ELLIS as counsel of record for Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc.. (Attorney Rachel Leigh Ellis added to party McLaren Automotive, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ellis, Rachel)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 11/19/2021 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions 12/3/2021 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 12/14/2021 at 8:30 AM. (iv)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on January 25, 2021 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: July 26, 2021. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: July 30, 2021. (iv)
January 14, 2021 Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Collin Hicks.. (Tang, Theodore)
January 13, 2021 Filing 14 AMENDED ANSWER and AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc.. (Gibson, Lisa)
December 29, 2020 Filing 13 DECLARATION of Lisa M. Gibson Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc.. (Gibson, Lisa)
December 29, 2020 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc..(Gibson, Lisa)
December 29, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 to Federal Court served on 12/23/2020. (Gibson, Lisa)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for January 25, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before January 20, 2021. (et)
December 28, 2020 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Robert L. Starr filed by Plaintiff Collin Hicks. (Starr, Robert)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (et)
December 28, 2020 Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 100, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 23, 2020 Filing 6 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Collin Hicks.. (Starr, Robert)
December 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
December 23, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa)
December 22, 2020 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Collin Hicks, upon Defendant McLaren Automotive, Inc. served on 11/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process, by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 2) (esa)
December 22, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, McLaren Automotive, Inc., filed by plaintiff Collin Hicks. (filed in state court 11/23/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
December 22, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Gibson, Lisa)
December 22, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., identifying McLaren Finance plc. (Gibson, Lisa)
December 22, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Stanley Mosk Courthouse, case number 20STCV44817 Receipt No: ACACDC-29662260 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. True and correct copies of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon McLaren Automotive, Inc., #2 Exhibit B. California Secretary of State (last visited December 7, 2020), #3 Exhibit C. The Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price for a 2018 McLaren 720S) (Attorney Lisa Marie Gibson added to party MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.(pty:dft))(Gibson, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collin Hicks v. McLaren Automotive, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Represented By: Lisa Marie Gibson
Represented By: Amy Toboco
Represented By: Rachel Leigh Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: McLaren Finance plc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Collin Hicks
Represented By: Theodore Richard Tang
Represented By: Robert L Starr
Represented By: Adam Morris Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?