James Shayler v. Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation et al
| JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
| GREGORY M. PALMER, an individual, WILLIAM W. WOODBURY and SONDRA K. WOODBURY, individually and as trustees of THE WILLIAM W. WOODBURY AND SONDRA K. WOODBURY DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 12, 1996, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, JUDY A PALMER, an individual, PENNY CURRY, an individual, GARY M. LAZARUS, O.D., PH.D., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, RITA L. HORNBACK, an individual, Penny Curry, Gregory M. Palmer, Rita L. Hornback, Does 1-10, inclusive, Judy A Palmer, William W. Woodbury, Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation and Sondra K. Woodbury |
| 2:2020cv11620 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 32
ORDER by Judge Mark C. Scarsi:GRANTING #31 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 4/27/2021. (lc)
|
| Filing 31 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendants Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation, Judy A Palmer, Sondra K. Woodbury, William W. Woodbury. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Cris Campbell Vaughan added to party Judy A Palmer(pty:dft), Attorney Cris Campbell Vaughan added to party Sondra K. Woodbury(pty:dft), Attorney Cris Campbell Vaughan added to party William W. Woodbury(pty:dft)) (Vaughan, Cris) |
| Filing 30 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation answer now due 2/8/2021, filed by Defendant Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation.(Attorney Cris Campbell Vaughan added to party Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation(pty:dft))(Vaughan, Cris) |
| Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Penny Curry served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Rita L. Hornback served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Gregory M. Palmer served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Judy A Palmer served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Sondra K. Woodbury served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021; William W. Woodbury served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation served on 1/7/2021, answer due 1/28/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #20 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/12/2021. (smo)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 18
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Judy A Palmer. (lh) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Gregory M. Palmer. (lh) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Rita L. Hornback. (lh) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Penny Curry. (lh) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Sondra K. Woodbury, William W. Woodbury. (lh) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Gary M. Lazarus, O.D., PH.D., a Professional Corporation. (lh) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29688479 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
