James Shayler v. Mateo Studios B, LLC et al
| JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, MATEO STUDIOS B, LLC, a California limited liability company, Mateo Studios B, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv11680 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer and/or Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion to Dismiss on file. (yl) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC, (Miskabi, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 .(Attorney Joseph Miskabi added to party Mateo Studios B, LLC(pty:dft))(Miskabi, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant James Shayler filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Entry of Default, #2 Exhibit Proof Of Service) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. 2nd Amended POS correcting service code (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 17
MINUTES ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's proof of service and concludes he has not demonstrated service was proper. The proof of service purports to show Defendant was served in compliance with a section of the California Corporations Code that was repealed in 2014. Accordingly, the Request for Entry of Default is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. #14 (yl)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Request for Entry of Default has been forwarded to the assigned Judge. Unclear as to citation on Proof of Service. (lom) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff James Shayler, re REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC #14 AMENDED POS served on 2/10/2021. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Entry of Default, #2 Exhibit Proof Of Service) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. AMENDED POS (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. For the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC served on 1/18/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than January 22, 2021. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mateo Studios B, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29746770 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
