Orlando Garcia v. Young Sik Han et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Myong Ok Han, Han Sang Kim and Young Sik Han |
| 2:2020cv11687 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Evidence of Remediation filed by Defendants Myong Ok Han, Young Sik Han, Han Sang Kim (Beck, James) |
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 4/20/2021 #15 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc)
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendants Myong Ok Han, Young Sik Han, Han Sang Kim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney James K Beck added to party Myong Ok Han(pty:dft), Attorney James K Beck added to party Young Sik Han(pty:dft), Attorney James K Beck added to party Han Sang Kim(pty:dft)) (Beck, James) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Myong Ok Han served on 1/20/2021, answer due 2/10/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/12/2021. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Myong Ok Han, Young Sik Han, Han Sang Kim. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29752705 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
