Garnik Blkhoyan v. Dr. Ikes Pharmacy et al
Plaintiff: Garnik Blkhoyan
Defendant: Dr. Ike's Pharmacy, Does 1-25 and Dr. Ikes Pharmacy
Case Number: 2:2020cv11766
Filed: December 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #14 by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorney's fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
January 22, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Stipulation filed by Garnik Blkhoyan Garnik Blkhoyan.(Shahbaz, Jacob)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, Granting #7 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to GARNIK BLKHOYAN and DR. IKES PHARMACY. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 4/15/2021. (es)
January 12, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for final disposition (rn)
January 12, 2021 Filing 11 STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Garnik Blkhoyan (Shahbaz, Jacob)
January 12, 2021 Filing 10 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Dr. Ikes Pharmacy (Kenefick, Matthew)
January 8, 2021 Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (es)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Scheduling Conference set for 2/9/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. [See document for details.] (es)
January 6, 2021 Filing 7 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Dr. Ikes Pharmacy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Application for Stay and Early Mediation) (Kenefick, Matthew)
January 6, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Dr. Ikes Pharmacy.(Kenefick, Matthew)
January 4, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car)
December 30, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-25, Dr. Ikes Pharmacy., filed by Plaintiff Garnik Blkhoyan. Filed in State Court on 11/25/2020 Submitted with Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
December 30, 2020 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Dr. Ike's Pharmacy, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on December 30, 2020. (Kenefick, Matthew)
December 30, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Dr. Ike's Pharmacy, identifying Garnik Blkhoyan; Dr. Ike's Pharmacy; Optio Rx. (Kenefick, Matthew)
December 30, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Dr. Ike's Pharmacy. (Kenefick, Matthew)
December 30, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STLC09922 Receipt No: ACACDC-29785300 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Dr. Ike's Pharmacy. (Attorney Matthew S Kenefick added to party Dr. Ike's Pharmacy(pty:dft))(Kenefick, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garnik Blkhoyan v. Dr. Ikes Pharmacy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Ike's Pharmacy
Represented By: Matthew S Kenefick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Ikes Pharmacy
Represented By: Matthew S Kenefick
Represented By: Shenel Ozisik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garnik Blkhoyan
Represented By: Jacob Arash Shahbaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?