John Doe v. Employers Choice Online, Inc. et al
| John Doe, as an individual and John Doe |
| Lamps Plus, Inc., Employers Choice Online, Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2020cv11786 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: GRANTING #9 Non-Resident Attorney John W. Drury APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Employers Choice Online, Inc., designating Eric E. Suits as local counsel. (Thrasher, Lupe)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc., served on December 30, 2020; January 6, 2021. (Suits, Eric) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Pamela O. Devata on behalf of Defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John W. Drury to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 1/8/2021, Receipt No. 29942340) filed by defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Suits, Eric) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc., (Suits, Eric) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John W. Drury. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Pamela Q. Devata. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10 inclusive, Employers Choice Online, Inc., Lamps Plus, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff John Doe. Filed in State Court on 11/20/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc. Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc.. (Suits, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV44588 Receipt No: ACACDC-29792410 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Employers Choice Online, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Removal, #4 State civil case cover sheet, #5 State complaint, #6 State summons, #7 State notice of case assignment, #8 State order to show cuse, #9 State notice of cmc) (Attorney Eric E. Suits added to party Employers Choice Online, Inc.(pty:dft))(Suits, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
