Brian Whitaker v. Mind Games, LLC
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Defendant: Mind Games, LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv11794
Filed: December 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Mind Games, LLC.(Attorney Arthur Slezak Gaus added to party Mind Games, LLC(pty:dft))(Gaus, Arthur)
February 9, 2021 Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Mind Games, LLC filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Gutierrez, Faythe)
February 9, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Whitaker (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Gutierrez, Faythe)
January 21, 2021 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Mind Games, LLC served on 1/13/2021, answer due 2/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Incorp Services, Inc -Jourdan Cerrillo - Compliance Specialist For Incorp Services Inc. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
January 6, 2021 Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell)
January 4, 2021 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Mind Games, LLC. (esa)
January 4, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa)
December 31, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell)
December 31, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell)
December 31, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell)
December 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29799734 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Whitaker v. Mind Games, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mind Games, LLC
Represented By: Arthur Slezak Gaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?