In re Shmuel Erde
| Shmuel Erde |
| Jaime Mendoza, George Vetrano, Janet Jackson, David Eisenberg and The Puffy Trust |
| 2:2020cv11809 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiencies in Appeal from Bankruptcy Court. Notice of Appeal filing fee was not paid. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appeal Deficiency to Appellant by Bankruptcy Court. Fee was not paid. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL to U.S. District Court, prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 12/31/20. (esa) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL Re: Order denying Shmuel Erde's Motion for permission to file motion for reconsideration entered on 12/28/20 by Bankruptcy Judge Vincent P Zurzolo, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 12/31/20. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:18-bk-20200 VZ, Adversary number: 2:19-ap-01290 VZ, BAP case number: NA., filed by appellant Shmuel Erde. (Attachments: #1 bk dkt) (esa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
