Mengesha Feseha et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
| Phyllis Denise Scott and Mengesha Feseha |
| Ray Brewer, Holly Wolcott, Dwayne Deas, Victoria Tsoong, Tamara Williams, Alia Hadad, City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Housing Department, Pro Realty Investments, Tami Crosby, Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar, Paul Meza, Peter Walford, Michael Feuer, Sal Baptista, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Mark A. Studdert, Daniel Bath, Dean C. Logan, Doug Swoger, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Tracie Dunn |
| 2:2020cv11818 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 80
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, IT IS ORDERED that (1) all of Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott's claims against all Defendants are voluntarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); (2) all of Plaintiff Mengesha Feseha's claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); (3) Defendant Victoria Tsoong's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 45) is DENIED AS MOOT; and (4) Defendant Daniel Bath's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 48) is DENIED AS MOOT. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
|
| Filing 79 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 78 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 77 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 76 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 75 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 74 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 73 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 72 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 71 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 70 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 69 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 68 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 67 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 66 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 65 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 64 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 63 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/21. (es) |
| Filing 62 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 61 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/2021. (es) |
| Filing 60 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)) #56 served on 6/2/21. (es) |
| Filing 59 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, Phyllis Denise Scott, re Summons Issued #18 served on 6/2/21. (es) |
| Filing 55 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. The hearing on Defendant Daniel Bath's motion to dismiss #48 noticed for 6/22/21 is ordered off calendar. The Court will decide this motion based on the briefing. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 57 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL filed by Plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41(a) (1)) #56 served on 6-2-2021. (et) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) filed by Plaintiff Mengesha Feseha. (et) |
|
Filing 58
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE (DKT. 38) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Salvador Lenard Baptista's Motion to Quash Service (Dkt. 38) is GRANTED. Baptista is advised that unless and until he is properly served, he is no longer a party to this lawsuit and has no further obligations thereto. [See Order for details] (et)
|
| Filing 54 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. The hearing on Defendant Victoria Tsoong's motion to dismiss #45 noticed for 6/8/21 is ordered off calendar. The Court will decide this motion based on the briefing. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 53
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order To Show Cause Why Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiffs are ORDERED, on or before June 7, 2021, to either: 1. File a proof of service that meets the requirements of Rule 4 as to each Defendant AND voluntarily dismiss those Defendants who have not been properly served by filing a Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Procedure 41(a), signed by both Plaintiffs. (A form Notice of Dismissal is attached for Plaintiffs' convenience.); or 2. Show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. [See document for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 52
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Daniel Bath's Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. 48) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: The June 21, 2021 hearing is VACATED and RESET to a telephonic hearing on June 22, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Plaintiffs shall file no later than June 1, 2021, either (1) their opposition to Bath's Motion to Dismiss, which addresses all of Bath's arguments, or (2) a written statement that they do not oppose Bath's Motion to Dismiss and agree to voluntarily dismiss their claims against Bath. Because Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, both Plaintiffs must sign either their opposition brief or their statement of non-opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 51 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage), re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage) #48 served on May 3, 2021. (Sargoy, Christopher) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage), identifying Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Bath Professional Corporation. (Sargoy, Christopher) |
| Filing 49 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage) #48 filed by Defendant Daniel Bath. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1.Los Angeles Superior Court case summary (docket sheet), #2 Exhibit 2.Verified First Amended Complaint For Fraud 1 Fraud 2 Violation Of Business And Professions Code 17200 Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress, #3 Exhibit 3.Plaintiff Phyllis Scotts Request for Dismissal - Real Property - With Prejudice of CitiMortgage Inc., #4 Exhibit 4.Plaintiff Phyllis Scotts Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal and Set Aside the Settlement Agreement, dated July 23, 2014, #5 Exhibit 5.Specially appearing party CitiMortgage Inc.s Opposition to Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal and Set Aside the Settlement Agreement, dated January 5, 2015, #6 Exhibit 6.Minute Order Regarding Motion on Behalf of Plaintiff Phyllis Scott to Vacate Order of Dismissal and to Set Aside Settlement Agreement, dated February 2, 2015, #7 Exhibit 7.Rulings/Orders Regarding Motion to Set Aside Dismissal and Settlement (Incorporated by Reference in Minute Order), #8 Exhibit 8.Summons and Partial Complaint in Mengesha Fesha, Phyllis Denise Scott. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al., United States District Court case no. 2:20-CV-11818-JGB-KES (dkt 18), #9 Exhibit 9.Business record search from Office of the Secretary of State of the State of California re: Bath Professional Corporation,, #10 Exhibit 10.Statement of Information No Change from Office of the Secretary of State of the State of California re: Bath Professional Corporation)(Sargoy, Christopher) |
| Filing 48 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage) filed by defendant Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage). Motion set for hearing on 6/21/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Defendant Daniel Baths Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rules 12(B)(4), 12(B)(5), 12(B)(6) and 12(B)(1); and Motion to Strike Punitive Damages Claim Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(F), #2 Declaration Declaration of Daniel Bath, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Christopher M Sargoy added to party Daniel Bath(pty:dft)) (Sargoy, Christopher) |
|
Filing 47
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. 45) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiffs shall file no later than May 18, 2021, either (1) their opposition to Tsoong's Motion to Dismiss, or (2) ) a written statement that they do not oppose the Motion to Dismiss and agree to voluntarily dismiss their claims against Tsoong. Because Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, both Plaintiffs must sign either their opposition brief or their statement of non-opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. (es)
|
| Filing 46 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's Complaint #45 Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Victoria Tsoong. (Tsoong, Victoria) |
| Filing 45 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Victoria Tsoong(in her personal capacity). Motion set for hearing on 6/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Victoria J. Tsoong, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Victoria J Tsoong added to party Victoria Tsoong(pty:dft)) (Tsoong, Victoria) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: It was discovered that the incorrect form Regarding Notice of Assignment CV-18 #6 was issued in error. Docket item 6 should be disregarded. A Corrected Notice of Assignment form CV-25 has been issued. (car) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Mengesha Feseha pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Sal Baptista(in his personal capacity), Sal Baptista(in his official capacity ). (es) |
|
Filing 39
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Motion To Quash Service (Dkt. 38) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. On March 25, 2021, Salvador Lenard Baptista ("Baptista"), proceeding pro se, filed a "Response to Civil Case 2:20-cv-11818-JGB-KES," which the Court will liberally construe as a Motion to Quash Service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5). (Dkt. #37 , #38 ). Plaintiffs shall no later than April 12, 2021, chose one of the following two options: Option 1: If Plaintiffs agree to voluntarily dismiss Baptista because he is not the person they intended to sue, then they shall file a Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Procedure 41(a) as to Baptista, which is signed by both Plaintiffs. (A form Notice of Dismissal is attached for Plaintiffs' convenience.) This dismissal would not preclude Plaintiffs from later serving the correct Sal Baptista, if he can be located. Option 2: If Plaintiffs wish to proceed against the Salvatore Baptista who resides in Redlands, then they shall file a response to Baptistas Motion to Quash Service (Dkt. 38), satisfying their burden to establish by affidavit or declaration that service on Baptista was valid under Rule 4. If Plaintiffs contend that Baptista is the person they intended to sue but agree that they failed to serve him properly, then they may file a notice of non-opposition to Baptista's Motion to Quash Service. If they file a notice of non-opposition, then the Court will grant Baptista's Motion, effectively dismissing Baptista from the action until Plaintiffs succeed in serving him properly. (et)
|
| Filing 41 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendants upon Defendant California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; City of Los Angeles served; City of Los Angeles Housing Department; Tami Crosby; Tami Crosby; Dwayne Deas; Michael Feuer; Alia Hadad; Dean C. Logan; Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar; Paul Meza; Pro Realty Investments; Doug Swoger; Victoria Tsoong; Peter Walford; Holly Wolcott served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by mail service. Original Summons NOT returned. (es) |
| AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Ray Brewer; Tracie Dunn; Mark A. Studdert; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development served on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail, the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (See Docket No. 41 Proof of Service) (es) |
| Filing 40 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Tamara Williams served on 3/15/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail upon Tamara Williams in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (es) |
| Filing 38 ANSWER to Complaint - (Referred), #1 filed by Defendant Sal Baptista(in his personal capacity).(et) |
| Filing 37 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Sal Baptista, served on Response to Civil Case 2:20-cv-11818-JGB-KES. (es) |
| Filing 36 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Local Rule 7.1-1) filed by Defendant Sal Baptista (es) |
| Filing 35 DUPLICATE PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; City of Los Angeles served; City of Los Angeles Housing Department; Tami Crosby; Tami Crosby; Dwayne Deas; Michael Feuer; Alia Hadad; Dean C. Logan; Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar; Paul Meza; Pro Realty Investments; Doug Swoger; Victoria Tsoong; Peter Walford; Tamara Williams; Holly Wolcott served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon by mail. Original Summons returned. (es) |
| DUPLICATE PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Ray Brewer; Tracie Dunn; Mark A. Studdert; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development served on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail, the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (See docket No. 35 Proof of Service-Acknowledgment of Service same document) (es) |
| Filing 34 PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; City of Los Angeles served; City of Los Angeles Housing Department; Tami Crosby; Tami Crosby; Dwayne Deas; Michael Feuer; Alia Hadad; Dean C. Logan; Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar; Paul Meza; Pro Realty Investments; Doug Swoger; Victoria Tsoong; Peter Walford; Tamara Williams; Holly Wolcott served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon by mail. Original Summons returned. (es) |
| PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Ray Brewer; Tracie Dunn; Mark A. Studdert; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development served on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail, the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (See docket No. 34 Proof of Service-Acknowledgment of Service same document) (es) |
|
Filing 32
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Service of Summons and Complaint by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: On February 25, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a form captioned "Proof of Service Acknowledgement of Service" indicating that their agent served the "Summons in Civil Action" on 22 different defendants by mailing it "as provided in FRCivP 5(b)." (Dkt. 31.) (See document for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE-ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Sal Baptista; Daniel Bath; California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; City of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles Housing Department; Tami Crosby; Michael Feuer; Alia Hadad; Dean C. Logan; Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar; Paul Meza; Pro Realty Investments; Doug Swoger; Victoria Tsoong; Tamara Williams; Holly Wolcott served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail Original Summons NOT returned. (es) |
| PROOF OF SERVICE-ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Ray Brewer; Tracie Dunn; Mark A. Studdert; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development served on 3/1/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed by mail. (See docket No. 33 Proof of Service-Acknowledgment of Service same document)(es) |
| Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Sal Baptista; Daniel Bath; California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; City of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles Housing Department; Tami Crosby; Dwayne Deas; Michael Feuer ; Alia Hadad; Dean C. Logan ; Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar; Paul Meza; Pro Realty Investments; Doug Swoger ; Victoria Tsoong; Peter Walford; Tamara Williams; Holly Wolcott served on 2/23/2021, answer due 3/16/2021, in compliance with statute not specified by method of service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (es) |
| PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mengesha Feseha, upon Defendant Ray Brewer; Tracie Dunn; Mark A. Studdert; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development served on 2/23/2021, answer due 4/26/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (See docket No. 31 Proof of Service-same document) (es) |
| Filing 30 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 from Phyllis Denise Scott 01/11/2021. Re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . Receipt number LA216728. (Anaya, Gabriella) |
|
Filing 29
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. [See document for details.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment (2 of 2)) (es)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Summons #2 , Summons #3 and Summons #4 were docketed in error. Caption of the summons(es) does not match the caption of the complaint. Docket item 2, 3 and 4 should be disregarded. (car) |
| Filing 28 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Tamara Williams(in her personal capacity), Tamara Williams(in her official capacity ). (car) |
| Filing 27 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Sal Baptista(in his personal capacity), Sal Baptista(in his official capacity ). (car) |
| Filing 26 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Pro Realty Investments. (car) |
| Filing 25 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. (car) |
| Filing 24 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Dean C. Logan(in his personal capacity ), Dean C. Logan(in his official capacity, as The Los Angeles County Recorder). (car) |
| Filing 23 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles County Recorder Registrar. (car) |
| Filing 22 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Paul Meza(in his personal capacity), Paul Meza(in his official capacity, as an employee of Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department). (car) |
| Filing 21 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Doug Swoger(in his personal capacity), Doug Swoger(in his official capacity, as Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department Director). (car) |
| Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Referred), #1 filed by Defendant Dwayne Deas(in his personal capacity), Dwayne Deas(in his official capacity, as Los Angeles Housing Inspector). (car) |
| Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles Housing Department. (car) |
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants Daniel Bath(in his official capacity, as Attorney for CitiMortgage), Daniel Bath(in his personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Tami Crosby(in her official capacity, Attorney for CitiMortgage), Tami Crosby(in her personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Victoria Tsoong(in her personal capacity), Victoria Tsoong(in her official capacity as attorney for the Title Insurance Company guaranteed to the City of Los Angeles). (car) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Referred), #1 filed by Defendant Peter Walford(in his personal capacity), Peter Walford(in his official capacity as attorney for the City of Los Angeles). (car) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Alia Hadad(in her official capacity, as attorney for the City of Los Angeles), Alia Hadad(in her personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Holly Wolcott(in her official capacity, as the City Clerk for the City of Los Angeles), Holly Wolcott(in her personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Michael Feuer(in his personal capacity), Michael Feuer(in his official capacity capacity, as City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles). (car) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (car) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Mark A. Studdert(in his official capacity as General Deputy Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations), Mark A. Studdert(in his personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Tracie Dunn(in her personal capacity), Tracie Dunn(in her official capacity as an employee of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development). (car) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Ray Brewer(in his official capacity as United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Los Angeles Field Director), Ray Brewer(in his personal capacity). (car) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (car) |
| Filing 4 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ISSUED 1/7/2021, SEE ITEM 5] 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Tracie Dunn(in her personal capacity), Tracie Dunn(in her official capacity ). (car) Modified on 1/7/2021 (car). |
| Filing 3 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ISSUED 1/7/2021, SEE ITEM 5] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants Ray Brewer(in his official capacity ), Ray Brewer(in his personal capacity). (car) Modified on 1/7/2021 (car). |
| Filing 2 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ISSUED 1/7/2021, SEE ITEM 5] 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (car) Modified on 1/7/2021 (car). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing fee $402 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiffs Phyllis Denise Scott, Mengesha Feseha. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
