In re Hedrick House Limited
| Hedrick House Limited |
| Emblaze One Inc., Jaspreet "Jas" Mathur and Jaspreet Jas Mathur |
| 2:2020mc00048 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: (Dkt.1) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Previously in this matter, I granted an application for the issuance of a subpoena for the production of documents for use in a foreign proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 1782 filed by Applicant Hedrick House Limited ("HHL"). See Dkt. 6 ("Order"). HHL now seeks an additional order compelling deposition testimony from Jaspreet "Jas" Mathur and Emblaze One Inc. ("Respondents"). See Dkt. 11. For the reasons set forth below, HHL's motion is GRANTED. (See document for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 14 MINUTES OF Motion to Reopen Case and Order Depositions held before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Counsel argue motion. Court takes motion under submission. Court Recorder: AT&T Digital Recording. (nbo) |
| Filing 12 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Reopen Case and Order Depositions #8 filed by In Re Hedrick House Limited. (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION TO APPLICANTS MOTION TO: (1) REOPEN MATTER (PER FRCP 60(B)(6), AND (2) ORDER DEPOSITIONS (PER 28 U.S.C. 1782) opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Reopen Case and Order Depositions #8 filed by Respondent Emblaze One and filed by Respondent Jaspreet Jas Mathur. (Attorney Rob D Cucher added to party Jaspreet Jas Mathur(pty:res))(Cucher, Rob) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (In Chambers) Order Rescheduling Hearing Date (Dkt. 8) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: On October 22, 2020, District Judge Klausner referred the Motion to Reopen Case and Order Depositions to Magistrate Judge McCormick. The hearing on the motion is currently set for November 23, 2020. On the Court's own motion, the hearing is rescheduled to Tuesday, December 1, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The hearing will be held telephonically. Judge McCormick's courtroom clerk will circulate call in information by email prior to the hearing. (es)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF MATTER to the Magistrate Judge. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Reopen Case and Order Depositions #8 is referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for hearing and Report and Recommendation. (jp) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Reopen Case and Order Depositions filed by Applicant Hedrick House Limited. Motion set for hearing on 11/23/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Michael Jason Lee, #3 Exhibit A - June 29, 2020 Email, #4 Exhibit B - Responses to Request for Production of Documents, #5 Exhibit C - July 27, 2020 Email, #6 Exhibit D - Respondents Document Production, #7 Exhibit E - Verified Response, #8 Exhibit F - Email Chain, #9 Declaration of Christopher John Jones, #10 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Michael Jason Lee added to party Hedrick House Limited(pty:inre)) (Lee, Michael) Modified on 12/3/2020 (es). |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Case should have been closed on entry dated May 29, 2020. #6 (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Application to Conduct Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. 1782 (Dkt. 1) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Therefore, HHL's Application is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: HHL's Application is GRANTED and Respondents are ORDERED to produce all non-privileged documents responsive to Request Nos. 1, 2, and 8-15 within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order. HHL's Application is DENIED as to Requests Nos. 3-7 and its request for deposition testimony from Respondents. (See document for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition TO APPLICANT'S SECOND ATTEMPT ON AN APPLICATION TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 Re: MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case,, #1 (Cucher, Rob) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant to General Order 05-07. ORDER case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for any discovery matters that are or may be referred by the district judge. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-mc-00048 RGK(DFMx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (rn)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge David O. Carter, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 8:20-mc-00005 DOC(DFMx) (rn)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 Receipt No: ACACDC-26222824 - Fee: $47, filed by Applicant Hedrick House Limited Hedrick House Limited. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher John Jones, #2 Exhibit (A-C to Christopher John Jones Declaration, #3 Declaration of Zhang Li, #4 Exhibit (D-L) to Zhang LI Declaration, #5 Declaration of Michael Jason Lee, #6 Exhibit (M-Q) to Declaration of Michael Jason Lee) (Attorney Michael Jason Lee added to party Hedrick House Limited(pty:inre))(Lee, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
