In re Phillip Andrew Craemer
Plaintiff: Phillip Andrew Craemer
Case Number: 2:2020mc00059
Filed: June 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Filing 2 Mail Returned addressed to Phillip Andrew Craemer re Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order #1 (yl)
June 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge Cormac J. Carney, ORDERING Letter to clerk submitted by Plaintiff Phillip Andrew Craemer received on 6/5/2020 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Because this document is not directly or indirectly related to a civil or criminal case pending within this district or another district, judicial determination is required. (iv)
June 11, 2020 RECEIVED BUT NOT FILED Letter forwarded to Chief Judge. Letter to Clerk sought to be filed by Plaintiff Phillip Andrew Craemer. (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re Phillip Andrew Craemer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Andrew Craemer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?