In Re Ronald Jason Palmieri
In Re: Ronald Jason Palmieri
Case Number: 2:2020mc00074
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Denying Application for Leave of Court to Practice on Behalf of Client by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying #1 APPLICATION: Accordingly, because Mr. Palmieri does not satisfy any of the limited exceptions that would permit him to practice in this Court without being admitted to practice in California, his Application for Leave of Court to Practice on Behalf of Client is DENIED. This Order closes the case. (see document for further details) (bm)
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO PRACTICE ON BEHALF OF CLIENT. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Ronald Jason Palmieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Ronald Jason Palmieri
Represented By: Ronald J Palmieri
Represented By: Gary J Gorham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?