Law Office of Shaun Setareh v. AT and T Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Law Office of Shaun Setareh
Defendant: AT&T Corporation, DOES 1-50, inclusive and AT and T Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv00030
Filed: January 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety and that the parties are finalizing their written settlement agreement #19 , this action is placed in inactive status. By 9/15/2021, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of 9/16/2021. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action #18 is hereby DENIED as moot. The 8/20/2021 hearing on the Motion and all other scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
July 30, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION for Order to Stay Briefing on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant AT and T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ranlett, Kevin)
July 29, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement Conditional filed by Plaintiff Law Office of Shaun Setareh. (Setareh, Chaim)
July 19, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending arbitration filed by defendant AT and T Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 8/20/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Rose A. Lyn, #3 Exhibit 1 to Lyn Declaration, #4 Declaration of Lori Gewecke, #5 Exhibit 1 to Gewecke Declaration, #6 Exhibit 2 to Gewecke Declaration, #7 Exhibit 3 to Gewecke Declaration, #8 Exhibit 4 to Gewecke Declaration, #9 Proposed Order) (Ranlett, Kevin)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Kevin S. Ranlett to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant AT&T Corporation, designating John Nadolenco as local counsel #16 . (gk)
June 23, 2021 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kevin S. Ranlett to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant AT and T Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31517036) filed by defendant AT and T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nadolenco, John)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #14 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until, and including, July 19, 2021. (iv)
March 18, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 19, 2021 filed by Defendant AT and T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nadolenco, John)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation #12 is APPROVED. The deadline for Defendant AT&T Corporation to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until, and including, 3/19/2021. (gk)
February 2, 2021 Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to March 19, 2021 filed by defendant AT and T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nadolenco, John)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #10 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. AT&T's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended 30 days to, and including, February 3, 2021. (lom)
January 11, 2021 Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AT and T Corporation answer now due 2/3/2021, filed by defendant AT and T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nadolenco, John)
January 6, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant AT and T Corporation, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on January 6, 2021. (Nadolenco, John)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
January 5, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant AT and T Corporation, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 served on January 5, 2021. (Nadolenco, John)
January 5, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
January 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh)
January 4, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants AT and T Corporation, Does, filed by Plaintiff Law Office of Shaun Setareh. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/02/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
January 4, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant AT&T Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 01/04/21. (Nadolenco, John)
January 4, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant AT&T Corporation, identifying AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc.. (Nadolenco, John)
January 4, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant AT&T Corporation. (Nadolenco, John)
January 4, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV46218 Receipt No: ACACDC-29852422 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant AT&T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney John Nadolenco added to party AT&T Corporation(pty:dft))(Nadolenco, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Law Office of Shaun Setareh v. AT and T Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Corporation
Represented By: John Nadolenco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT and T Corporation
Represented By: John Nadolenco
Represented By: Rose Lyn
Represented By: Kevin S. Ranlett
Represented By: Rose Ashley Lyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Law Office of Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Nolan Dilts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?