Christopher Ortiz v. GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Ortiz
Defendant: Does 1 through 25 inclusive and GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00048
Filed: January 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
January 5, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa)
January 5, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant GEICO Casualty Company, Inc. (filed in state court 9/24/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 14)(esa)
January 5, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Christopher Ortiz, upon Defendant GEICO Casualty Company, Inc. served on 8/25/2020 by mail. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 9/15/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 52) (esa)
January 5, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, GEICO Casualty Company, Inc., Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Christopher Ortiz. (filed in state court 8/24/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 5) (esa)
January 5, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.. (McCurdy, Matthew)
January 5, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant GEICO Casualty Company, Inc., identifying Birkshire Hathaway, Inc.. (McCurdy, Matthew)
January 5, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior, case number 20NWCV00472 Receipt No: ACACDC-29869347 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Superior Complaint, #4 Superior Answer) (Attorney Matthew Thomas McCurdy added to party GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.(pty:dft))(McCurdy, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christopher Ortiz v. GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company, Inc.
Represented By: Jared Kyle LeBeau
Represented By: John T Brooks
Represented By: Matthew Thomas McCurdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Ortiz
Represented By: Antonio J Ibarra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?