Terry Fabricant v. Austin Business Finance, LLC, et al
| Terry Fabricant |
| Austin Business Finance, LLC doing business as Get Backd and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them |
| 2:2021cv00085 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Andre Birotte |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdictionover this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC.(Duffy, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Austin Business Finance, LLC answer now due 3/19/2021, filed by Defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC.(Attorney Joseph Duffy added to party Austin Business Finance, LLC(pty:dft))(Duffy, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, upon Defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC served on 1/27/2021, answer due 2/17/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jenna Schneider, General Counsel on behalf of Austin Business Finance d/b/a Get Backd; this is the current registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, upon Defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC served on 1/19/2021, answer due 2/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joy Nassour, Secretary for James L. Pledger; previous registered agent for Austin Business Finance-this registered agent is no longer valid in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 10 ALIAS SUMMONS issued as to Defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC d/b/a Get Backd. (gk) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Friedman, Todd) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Austin Business Finance, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29889979 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Terry Fabricant(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
