Pony Sweat Aerobics et al v. WIT Fitness Limited et al
Pony Sweat Aerobics and Emilia Richeson |
Sam Kitching, WIT Fitness Limited, Daniel Williams and WIT Fitness, Inc. |
2:2021cv00125 |
January 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Christina A Snyder |
Karen L Stevenson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Pony Sweat Aerobics, Emilia Richeson. (Goldman, Jeremy) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pony Sweat Aerobics, Emilia Richeson, identifying PONY SWEAT AEROBICS; EMILIA RICHESON; WIT FITNESS LIMITED; WIT FITNESS, INC.; DANIEL WILLIAMS; SAM KITCHING; VGC PARTNERS. (Goldman, Jeremy) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Pony Sweat Aerobics, Emilia Richeson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Goldman, Jeremy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Pony Sweat Aerobics, Emilia Richeson. (Goldman, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29917914 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Pony Sweat Aerobics, Emilia Richeson. (Attorney Jeremy S Goldman added to party Pony Sweat Aerobics(pty:pla), Attorney Jeremy S Goldman added to party Emilia Richeson(pty:pla))(Goldman, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.