Maral Tazian v. Geico Casualty Company et al
| Maral Tazian |
| Geico Indemnity Company, Geico General Insurance Company and Geico Casualty Company |
| 2:2021cv00191 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
Filing 15
ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation extending the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint #13 is hereby granted. Defendants shall have until 3/12/2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (gk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulations > Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days). Stipulations > Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) event was utilized in docketing this filing. This filing, together with the prior stipulation, seeks a cumulative extension of time greater than 30 days. See Local Rule 8-3. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 13 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Geico General Insurance Company answer now due 3/12/2021; Geico Indemnity Company answer now due 3/12/2021; Geico Casualty Company answer now due 3/12/2021, filed by Defendants Geico General Insurance Company; Geico Indemnity Company; Geico Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-00191 AB(MRWx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-00191-AB (PDx). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, Geico Casualty Company.(Heidtke, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Damon N. Vocke. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Maral Tazian in Los Angeles Superior Court on 11/24/2020, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company identifying Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, case number 20STCV45210 Receipt No: ACACDC-29948739 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, Geico Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Record, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Karen Brinster in Support of Removal) (Attorney Daniel B Heidtke added to party Geico Casualty Company(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel B Heidtke added to party Geico General Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel B Heidtke added to party Geico Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Heidtke, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
