Carlos Cuevas v. CVS Health Corporation et al
| Carlos Cuevas |
| CVS Health, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and CVS Health Corporation |
| 2:2021cv00209 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO STAY ACTION AND TRANSFER MATTER TO BINDING ARBITRATION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Based on the Stipulation of the Parties, dated January 20, 2021, and good cause appearing, it is therefore ordered that: All causes of action in Plaintiffs Complaint be submitted to binding arbitration; and The Court shall retain jurisdiction to the extent allowed under federal law. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Transfer Case to Arbitration filed by Defendant CVS Health Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Jones, Leilani) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The above matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on March 9, 2021 at 10:00 A.M. The conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference and report to the Court not later than 14 days after they confer as required by F.R.Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of LEILANI E. JONES re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Re Service and Filing Thereof filed by Defendant CVS Health Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Jones, Leilani) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant CVS Health Corporation. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 1/11/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants CVS Health, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Carlos Cuevas. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 112/9/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CVS Health, identifying CVS Health Corporation; CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; Caremark Rx, LLC. (Jones, Leilani) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of LEILANI E. JONES re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant CVS Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration Re Service)(Jones, Leilani) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CVS Health. (Jones, Leilani) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV47087 Receipt No: ACACDC-29968255 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant CVS Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Answer, #3 Declaration Re Service) (Attorney Leilani Elizabeth Jones added to party CVS Health(pty:dft))(Jones, Leilani) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
