Christopher Boffoli v. NetEase, Inc. et al
Christopher Boffoli |
DOES 1 through 10, NetEase, Inc. and Guangzhou NetEase Computer System Co., Ltd. |
Minden Pictures, Inc. and Dana Hursey |
2:2021cv00243 |
January 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to NetEase, Inc. answer now due 3/22/2021, filed by Defendant NetEase, Inc..(Posner, Daniel) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daniel C Posner on behalf of Defendant NetEase, Inc. (Attorney Daniel C Posner added to party NetEase, Inc.(pty:dft))(Posner, Daniel) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli, upon Defendant NetEase, Inc. served on 1/28/2021, answer due 2/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tami Powers (Team Litigation Leader) - Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 14 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Interested Party Dana Hursey. Related Case(s): 2:21-cv-00466 (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 12 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-00861 AB(JCx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero and Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-00243 AB(JCx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Interested Party Minden Pictures, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:21-cv-00337 (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-00861; 2:20-cv-00862; 2:20-cv-00863; 2:20-cv-02044; and 2:20-cv-11331 (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 9 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Guangzhou NetEase Computer System Co., Ltd., NetEase, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Christopher Boffoli. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli, identifying NETEASE, INC., GUANGZHOU NETEASE COMPUTER SYSTEM CO., LTD.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29981213 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint) (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Christopher Boffoli(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.