Roger Flores v. Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC et al
| Roger Flores |
| Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv00275 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 18STCV10074, acknowledged on 3/4/2021. (gk) |
| Filing 24 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse. (gk) |
Filing 23
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court GRANTS Flores' Motion to Remand #16 and REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 18STCV10074, for lack of jurisdiction. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Court #16 presently scheduled for hearing on February 19, 2021, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 21 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial at least 15 days, filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores.. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 20 REPLY In Support of First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 19 Opposition Opposition re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Wertheim, #2 Declaration of Chris Cruz, #3 Declaration of Jan P. Abbs)(Cruz, Christopher) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores, identifying None. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 16 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. Motion set for hearing on 2/19/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Fawn F. Bekam, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 15 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/12/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 2/26/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 14
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 19-03 filed on 1/14/2021. The case number will now read CV 21-275-DMG (Ex). Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant General Order 19-03 (identical case) by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-00275 DMG(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC.(Cruz, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-00932-DMG-E (C.D. Cal.) (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. Filed in State Court on 12/28/18 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. Filed in State Court on 9/12/2019 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC amending Amended Complaint,, filed by Plaintiff Roger Flores. Filed in State Court on 12/8/2020 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-00932-DMG-E (Wertheim, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC, identifying Exova, Inc. and Element Materials Technology Holding USA Inc.. (Wertheim, Michael) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. (Wertheim, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Karen Frye re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. (Wertheim, Michael) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Hendrik Sluiters re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. (Wertheim, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 18STCV10074 Receipt No: ACACDC-29998398 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Summons and Complaint and Related Documents, #2 Exhibit B - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Second Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - State and Federal Documents) (Attorney Michael Alexander Wertheim added to party Element Materials Technology Huntington Beach LLC(pty:dft))(Wertheim, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
